Possumblog

Not in the clamor of the crowded street, not in the shouts and plaudits of the throng, but in ourselves, are triumph and defeat.--Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

REDIRECT ALERT! (Scroll down past this mess if you're trying to read an archived post. Thanks. No, really, thanks.)

Due to my inability to control my temper and complacently accept continued silliness with not-quite-as-reliable-as-it-ought-to-be Blogger/Blogspot, your beloved Possumblog will now waddle across the Information Dirt Road and park its prehensile tail at http://possumblog.mu.nu.

This site will remain in place as a backup in case Munuvia gets hit by a bus or something, but I don't think they have as much trouble with this as some places do. ::cough::blogspot::cough:: So click here and adjust your links. I apologize for the inconvenience, but it's one of those things.


Wednesday, August 21, 2002

Wow. From Gilbert Nicholson of The Birmingham Business Journal, just what everyone in D.C. and Birmingham have been clamoring for:Birmingham-D.C. high-speed rail summit held in Atlanta Wednesday
[...] The "Southeast High-Speed Rail Summit" will be held 1-2:30 p.m. at the Ritz Carlton hotel in downtown Atlanta.

Hosted by the Southeast Economic Alliance – an organization of 14 chambers of commerce in six Southern states – panelists will discuss the benefits of the 800-mile route proposed as a high-speed demonstration project. Trains would run more than 90 mph, according to an Alliance news release.

The first phase of the system would link nine cities, including Birmingham and Atlanta, a route deemed unprofitable by a 1994 Alabama Department of Transportation study.

The study found 196 curves would limit speeds to less than 80 mph on the current Norfolk Southern line used by Amtrak's Crescent passenger train. More than 80 curves between Irondale and Atlanta won't allow speeds more than 50 mph.

Two other alternatives were considered: an abandoned CSX line and a new high-speed rail system to run in the middle or to the side of Interstate 20. Each of the three options cost more than $1 billion in 1994 dollars.

The study's conclusion: "Even with four trains a day at 80 mph, the projected ridership of approximately 455 people per day for high-speed service does not appear to warrant the anticipated construction costs."
Well, gee whiz, with all of the stunning success of Amtrak's Acela line, who on earth could want such a wonderfully useless thing as a high speed train that can go no faster than any other train, all while costing at least a billion big'uns?
Alabama Power Co. president and CEO Charles McCrary and outgoing U.S. Rep. Earl Hilliard, D-Birmingham, are among six panelists who will discuss a proposed high-speed rail route from Birmingham to Washington, D.C. [...]
Ahhh, I see. I believe APCo. wants to sell 'em some juice (and cut their main competitor TVA out of the picture), and ol' Brer Earl is looking to get his family on with the railroad.

Good gig if you can get it, I suppose.


Comments: Post a Comment

al.com - Alabama Weblogs


free hit counter
Visits since 12/20/2001--
so what if they're mostly me!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't
yours?
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com